DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JRE
Decket No. 2796-13
S January 2014
This is in reference to your application Ter correction. of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section-1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Bo
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and appl
Statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You served on active duty in the Navy from 12 to 22 August 1975
when you were discharged by reason of unsuitability due to
enuresis, whichis a condition not considered a disability under
the laws administered by the military departments.
There is no indication in the available records that you were
unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was
incurred in or aggravated by your 11 days of service. In
addition, that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded
you a disability rating for anxiety almost forty years after
you were discharged from the Navy was not considered probative
of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA acted
without regard to the issue of your fitness for naval service
in 1975. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitledto have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Pee
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3480-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 3014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative _regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6695 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval -Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4905 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2250-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of ‘unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6063 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7227 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your case was forwarded and you received an undesirable discharge on 11 July 1975, The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, record of service, desire to upgrade your discharge and contention that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1837-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5909 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2734-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,. together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The military departments may assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service fixed as of the date of separation or permanent member has been found unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability, and ratings are retirement. ...